>> Looks right: The area between horizontal skylines should influence the
>> spacing. However, I think we need a parameter to adjust the amount of
>> influence.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean.
I mean that some people probably want a more rigid spacing, only
slightly influenced by the area inbetween. This is a matter of taste
> I suggest that this would be added to spacing alists, for example
>
> \paper {
> system-system-spacing #'average-gap = #4
> }
>
> would mean that the desired whitespace area is 4 staffspace * line
> width.
Yes, but I would like to have an additional parameter, say,
system-system-spacing #'rigidity = X
where X is a number between 0 and 1. Value 1 essentially means no
skyline integrals, while value 0 exactly the opposite.
> I've identified two potential problems that may appear, and ideas
> for solutions:
>
> www.anonstorage.net/PStorage/621.skyline-integrals-teeth-marked.pdf
> www.anonstorage.net/PStorage/328.integrals-pitfall-two-marked.pdf
A possible solution is to `dampen' the skyline for the area
computation, this is, to apply the beam logic to the skyline. For
example, this
----------
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
becomes this:
---------
\
\
\
\
------------
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
