The basic question is this: is this test helpful for programmers? At first glance I'd say that it is, provided that you update the syntax as David suggested.
IMO it takes a pretty silly example for something to *not* be a helpful test case. Sure, having complicated scheme here might mean that future changes to some scheme interfaces would need to update this file as well, but IMO that's a perfectly legitimate function of a regtest! Now, this test might be useful as a LSR snippet as well, so you may want to consider sending it there (at least once LSR supports 2.16). Until that happens, it could got to Documentation/snippets/new, but I recommend asking James or Phil to handle that part of it. http://codereview.appspot.com/5882053/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
