Hi, the LSR is now using 2.14 ! For testing I added a new file: "test for the new version (2.14.2)" Of course this should be not approved. :) Worked fine.
I noticed some problems: Sebastiano or better his LSR-set-up-code was puzzled by the files from `Documentation/snippets/new' which I had integrated according to CG 7.7 point 2 and of some other missing files. In his last mail he wrote: Am 30. März 2012 00:12 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna <vi...@dsi.unimi.it>: > On Mar 29, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > >> The following 3 Snippets are unapproved, so they were not in the >> LSR-tarball I had downloaded. And I didn't work on them: >> >> time-signature-in-parentheses---method-3-[needs-lsr-upgrade].ly >> printing-figured-bass-extender-lines-without-a-starting-figure-[needs-lsr-upgrade--=-2.14].ly >> nokia-ringtone.ly >> > > OK. > >> _All_ "Unknown files" are from `Documentation/snippets/new' as >> requested by the Contributors Guide. >> see: >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/updating-lsr-to-a-new-version > > Well, I didn't know there was a contributor guide :). > > The problem is that while this is fine, there is no procedure for inserting > *new* snippet from the .ly files. My code just look at the snippets in the > tarballs, matches titles, and replaces the code. I mean, I don't even *look* > at the text. So these snippets will have to be inserted by means of the web > interface... > >> Do you expect further problems? > > > I'd say no. > > Ciao, > > seba Seems CG 7.7 should be rewritten in this point. Regards, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
