Le 13/04/2012 19:54, Phil Holmes disait :
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean-Charles Malahieude"
<lily...@orange.fr>
To: "Lily Bugs" <bug-lilyp...@gnu.org>; "lilypond-devel"
<lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: issues 2266 and 1721


Hi all,

I just noticed something:

1- I overuse of @rlsrnamed{original,translated} in order to present a
translated link towards "snippets", like @rlsrnamed{Pitches,Hauteurs}.

1-1 When in NR, this produces tons of lines in the logs like
WARNING: Unable to find node 'translated' in book snippets.
@rlsrnamed{Pitches,Hauteurs} is "snippets/hauteurs.fr.html" which
doesn't exist, so I get nowhere.

1-2 When in LM, there in nothing in the logs
@rlsrnamed{Pitches,Hauteurs} is "snippets/pitches.fr.html" where I
want to go, but non success.

2- I overuse of @rglosnamed{original,translated} in order to present a
translated link towards "glossary" both in LM and NR, and I never get
any kind of warning or error, and the link is effective.
@rglosnamed{{Pitch names,Noms des notes} is
"music-glossary/pitch-names.fr.html" where I want to arrive and it's a
perfect landing.


My questioning is:
Why a same macro could behave differently when in LM or in NR, and
why, though they look identical do they work differently according to
the target manual?


Cheers,
Jean-Charles


I thought I'd have a look at this, and have just been doing so. I think
the difference between learning and notation is that there is no
instance of @rlsrnamed or @rlsr in learning, whereas it's used
extensively in notation. So there's no difference in the file types,
except it's used in one and not in the other....


It might have something to do with the way both glossary and snippet are built: I just noticed, on fresh make doc on staging (as of
312f7ebc83ec9fb8cbbddfcf78b65a8502c16ab2 ), that
music-glossary.splittexi.log weight is 0 byte, but
snippets.splittexi.log is 190.9 Kio (1618 lines).

Cheers,
Jean-Charles

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to