On 4 mai 2012, at 01:23, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > > > On 4 May 2012 01:08, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: > On 4 mai 2012, at 00:37, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > >> On 3 May 2012 13:07, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: >> 2460 is more or less impossible. >> >> Why? I don know the details of Lilypond's internals, but a "white-out" is a >> rather simple idea, isn't it? >> >> Łukasz >> > > What's hard is creating flexible blocking mechanisms for left-shifting > objects. When collisions happen, there is no notion of elasticity - objects > are not allowed to touch or they ignore each other. Here, we want something > between - objects that can overlap but just by a little. We'd have to redo > the spring and rod model at the core of LilyPond, which itself would a summer > of lily (if not two or three!). > > Cheers, > MS > > Aaah, I see... Thanks for the explanation. But as I understand, not > everywhere springs and rods are used, e.g. beams collide with many objects > and that's ok. If there is a place where I can read about springs and rods in > Lilypond, just let me know instead of answering me. > > Łukasz >
There's a file you can read... lily/simple-spacer.cc That is the long and short of the nuts and bolts. You can work backwards from the file to see where the functions in it are called (I believe that it's only in lily/constrained-breaking.cc). Cheers, MS
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
