http://codereview.appspot.com/6195098/diff/4023/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6195098/diff/4023/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1077 Documentation/notation/input.itely:1077: I'm not comfortable with tables/lists like this in the NR. Yes I am sure it works for those that think like that, but for a user it's too complicated. @examples work much better. I'm not disparaging the work you've done but from a documentation point of view I think 'we' (royal or otherwise) can do better for users. If this were the Application Usage manual then sure, but not the NR. Examples are much better. I spent an age getting this right personally from a doc point of view last week and I just don't think this is in the 'spirit' of the NR. Happy to get another opinion. If you don;t mind (because I know how personal this <> stuff had become) I can look at this part again over the weekend and use this to make a new patch for the doc myself? http://codereview.appspot.com/6195098/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
