On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> We should, definitely! >> There are bad tie and slur shapes in Lily, but this is not due to >> not having discrete lengths. > > Umm, yes. I've meant: Should lilypond do a `better' job than the > engravers working with those stamps?
I understand. On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:31 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Frankly, I don't see the point in simulating well-craftedness by > artificially introducing minor deficiencies associated with some of the > better work. We don't make slightly eroded staff lines copying the wear > and tear on the tools of particularly renowned publishers, either. +1 @Werner: i could live with an *option* doing this, but i doubt that people are interested in writing it. And i think we have much, much, much more important stuff to work on. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
