On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 05:18:57PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > So there was considerable and non-trivial difference between a vcs diff > and a release tarball diff. And the instructions reflect that. > > I am not really all too sure how to apply this to our situation. At > present, I think most people would not really be interested in a > separately downloadable diff anyway.
Yes. Further discussions on the GNU maintainers list (since yesterday) shows that there's general contentment with using the primary source (i.e. git) for the "authors list", and I'm confident that this applies to the recommendation of providing diffs as well. So I'm going to cross this off from the list of things to worry about. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel