On 1 juil. 2012, at 17:08, David Kastrup wrote: > mts...@gmail.com writes: > >> It's back... >> >> The only thing that doesn't the work the way I'd expect it is >> Skyline::padded. It seems to not be adding the padding correctly (Joe - >> any ideas)? This causes tighter than desired spacing in >> alignment-order.ly. Other than that it is all reviewable! For those >> who were keeping score before, files like size16.ly, size20.ly etc. were >> a major nuisance and are now kept at bay. > > Tell you what: _that_ would be a good reason to make another release > candidate, and if it does not get through, branch off a 2.16 prerelease > branch to cherry-pick into _before_ merging the skyline stuff. > > And if, against all pessimistic expectations, the skyline stuff turns > out not giving us any relevant regressions in the next months, why, we > can have a short release cycle for 2.18 for a change. > > But this is the sort of thing I definitely want to see in the > development versions, and that I definitely don't want to see in 2.16 > release candidates at the current point of time. >
Couldn't agree more - this shouldn't be part of 2.16. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
