On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:21:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > I mean, we have too few categories for regressions. I can see the > following: -snip- > My personal opinion is that
My personal opinion is that we should not discuss major policy changes in the middle of a thread about dots and staff sizes. There is a proposal to change the stable release policy: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-06/msg00462.html http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_3.html That proposal is currently "under debate", although there was such little discussion that I'm at a loss as to what to do next. The whole point of GOP was to have a clear discussion with no surprises -- everybody would know when proposals would arise, there would be two weeks (or more!) of discussion, so that nobody would miss anything if they weren't paying attention to every little bug discussion email thread, etc. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
