On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:18 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > The key point is being able to employ user-definable functions in a wide > variety of situations. We currently have the situation that > [...]
Whoah, that was one hell of an explanation. I think i understood it (at least most parts) and i support the change. What about trimming it (read: turning into a sales pitch ;-P), adding "any objections?" at the end and sending it to -user? Graham is right that we better ask before we change. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
