hi all,

>> Keith, I hope I fixed lyrics-bar.ly.
>
>
> Yes, it comes out nicely.
>
>
>> 1. in repeat-sign.ly the thick-lined staff has now the dots
>>    outside of staff, while the c++ version had it inside -
>>    there may be a difference how line-thickness is handled.
>
>
> The latest Scheme version you sent uses the correct staff line thickness.
> The last C version you posted used the layout line thickness, for bar lines
> and span bars.

thanks for spotting, I use Marc's Scheme code now.

> The gap you require to set the dot, dot-y-length + line-thickness + 2 * 0.75
> line-thickness,
> includes a lot of space for the gaps on each side of the dot, when the staff
> lines are thick.  You might be happy with a rule to ensure a minimum
> proportion of white-space  1.2( dot-y-length + line-thickness )

ok, I applied this (and did a bit of restructuring to keep
lyrics-bar.ly the way we like).
I also changed those regtests that show where's the change of dot placement
inside or outside staff.
I have now four commits: regtest changes plus one change
in three (sort of unrelated) functions each in bar-line.scm
(colon, extent and line-span computation).
what review process do you prefer/suggest?
one review per commit or review in one, push in four?

p

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to