On 19 Aug 2012, at 10:27, "Phil Holmes" <em...@philholmes.net> wrote: -- --
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" > <gra...@percival-music.ca> > To: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> > Cc: <philehol...@googlemail.com>; <d...@gnu.org>; <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>; > <re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 7:29 PM > Subject: Re: Tidies binary relocation (issue 6463066) > > >> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 03:40:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: <gra...@percival-music.ca> >>> To: <philehol...@googlemail.com>; <d...@gnu.org> >>> Cc: <re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>; <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> >>> >>> >I haven't looked at the new logic in detail, but exactly what was >>> >LILYPOND_RELOCATE_PREFIX doing, and why do we no longer need it? If >>> >>> TBH, I have no idea. It relies on an environment variable that has >>> no mention in our docs anywhere, and the only reference I can find >>> to it at all is an email message from 2006, where using it didn't >>> fix the problem anyway. >> >> That doesn't necessarily anything. It could be used in GUB for >> building, or lilypad-osx or lilypad-windows for compiling. I must >> admit that I've grepped for it in both git repositories and >> couldn't find it, though. It might even be involved in the >> lilypond jail settings (i.e. for LSR). (and note that unless you >> have personally set up a working LSR, do not assume that the docs >> on lilypond jail actually work!) > > I did the same. It's not just that it doean't appear anywhere in our build > system - it doesn't appear anywhere on t'internet, either. Seriously? Peter Kay memes? It's the future! James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
