---- Original Message -----
From: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org>
To: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net>
Cc: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Patchy email from PhilH
"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes:
I'd not run it for a while, so yes. This was a result of my build
machine turning off in the middle of a patchy run. Re-running it gave
this result, since it thought that a patchy run was in progress.
Re-running it again failed on the doc build, although it looked like
the problem file was an ancient notation template.
Hash collision?
--
David Kastrup
Would this be when 2 files have the same hash and so don't get properly
rebuilt??
I've just run a completely fresh build "manually" (i.e. without patchy) -
delete the build directory and start from scratch, using the detached head
of origin/staging. Builds fine, and the change in glossary I made is fine.
Hmm...
At a loss where to look now.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
