Il giorno ven, 31/08/2012 alle 13.21 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto: > That sounds good to me! If we treat Grenouille more like a web > server than a workhorse, then I think it'll go smoother.
I would have preferred a workhorse, but in its current state it has proven to be not so well usable as such. > People > like James can build new test results quite quickly, have them > automatically uploaded to Grenouille, and Grenouille can then > server them to reviewers. That bypasses the dyndns questions, > while still allowing faster (and distributed!) generation of test > results. I'm a bit afraid of the extra bandwidth this will use, but we probably have no other solution for the next days (or more... as long as Grenouille has these too frequent crashes), and it's up to me to make Patchy not bloat up too much all tests results with so many log files :-p > I still think that this can be handled by the existing Patch-new > system. Just allow Grenouille to accept uploads, and forbid > Patchy test-patches from changing the status to Patch-review > unless it has successfully uploaded to Grenouille. It could work. Given my other ongoing tasks, I think it'll take between three days and a week to get this new workflow running. Best, John _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
