On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 01:27:23PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > 172 ~ 188 is an abomination anyway. It would be reasonably > straightforward to accept a pair here, like #(172 . 188) or > 172/188 which is equivalent.
Straightforward from a programming perspective, but as far as printed music is concerned, a tempo range doesn't look anything like 172/188. I'm not wild about the scheme range #(172. 188) either. Hmm, I wonder if we could steal a page from LaTeX and use 172 -- 188 to indicate a range? of course then we might run into problems with people writing 172 - 188 so it's not a foolproof solution. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
