>> David, please relax. I've typeset hundreds of pages with lilypond, >> including complicated piano and organ music; I don't lightly >> suggest syntactic stuff just to annoy you. > > We are getting most certainly nowhere if people don't even bother > understanding the technical points of my replies.
I try. > They get no followup, Because I don't know what to answer. It's beyond my knowledge. > and the next proposal coming up is not any more suitable for pretty > much the same reasons. This can happen, yes. >> Graham's and my suggestions are very restrictive, and we are just >> playing around with possible syntax forms. > > How about considering how they are supposed to translate to and from > Scheme? This is the next step IMHO. Additionally, you are the doorman we have to pass :-) >> It would be tremendously helpful if you can show possible syntax >> *alternatives* instead of just pretending to be a naysayer. > > I've posted actual working definitions for that purpose. It seems I've missed that, lost in the many examples you've given to demonstrate what doesn't work. > They would definitely simplify the kind of entry you are asking for. Please repeat. Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel