> Currently, the parser is still undergoing significant restructuring > work in major areas and mechanisms. That work entails a lot of time > spent on ironing out parser conflicts where some input would > correspond to multiple and diverging interpretations according to > the current syntax. It is significant work ironing out those > conflicts. Adding additional rules for erroneous input means more > potential for conflict, so it would make the ongoing work even > harder.
I suggest that the possibility of improved error messages should be taken into account while doing design decisions. > So I would first like to get to a state where I consider the > parser/syntax to be mostly "in harmony" with its design before > adding user-helpful error rules that make further work harder. OK. Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel