The glyph shape is OK, thanks. Have you tested the appearance on paper of all available sizes, using a 300 or 600dpi printer?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6503091/diff/16001/mf/parmesan-clefs.mf File mf/parmesan-clefs.mf (left): http://codereview.appspot.com/6503091/diff/16001/mf/parmesan-clefs.mf#oldcode902 mf/parmesan-clefs.mf:902: The dimension of the bounding box is not correct. It's far too large, as can be seen in the DVI proof. http://codereview.appspot.com/6503091/diff/16001/mf/parmesan-clefs.mf File mf/parmesan-clefs.mf (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6503091/diff/16001/mf/parmesan-clefs.mf#newcode791 mf/parmesan-clefs.mf:791: ..z2+(0, blot_rad) This must be `.. {up}z2 + (0, blot_rad)', otherwise the curve doesn't start with the right direction. This wouldn't be that bad, but it were different to all other glyph shapes. Ditto for all other transitions from `--' to `..' (this is, using the proper `{up}', `{right}', etc.). http://codereview.appspot.com/6503091/diff/16001/mf/parmesan-clefs.mf#newcode793 mf/parmesan-clefs.mf:793: --quartercircle scaled blot_diameter rotated 180 shifted (z3r + (blot_rad, blot_rad)) Using `quartercircle' gives good results in the type1 output. I only ask you to make the line fit into 80 columns :-) On the other hand, why not simply using something like startcurve_point{down} .. {right}endcurve_point ? This might be shorter, and easier to read. http://codereview.appspot.com/6503091/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel