http://codereview.appspot.com/6529043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/expressive.itely File Documentation/notation/expressive.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6529043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/expressive.itely#newcode1059 Documentation/notation/expressive.itely:1059: @lilypond[verbatim,quote,relative=2] On 2012/09/25 21:07:06, Trevor Daniels wrote:
This example shows a beam extending from a stem to the final note of the glissando. Is this correct, or would it be better to suppress the beam?
just like ordinary duration display: either a beam or a flag. Bartók's String Quartet no. 4. has examples for both. I find your example fine. is it mentioned that glissando is not standardised? e.g. Bartók wanted all glissandi start immediately, while others use the headless stem notation, reserving full headed notes to mean fixed pitch through the whole duration. http://codereview.appspot.com/6529043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
