On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:10 AM, <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > On 2012/09/26 06:14:04, janek wrote: >> i find the name misleading. > > That terminology is employed in a number of places in the grammar and > code, and this patch does not invent any property but just deals > better with existing definitions and usage.
Sure, i didn't mean to blame you. > Not "on need". If the property grob-property is defined, it calls > "list" on it to create a one-element list (which this code as well as > similar code elsewhere is expecting), otherwise it takes the property > grob-property-path as the source for that list. Ah! thanks for explanation. Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
