On 27/09/12 19:15, Ian Hulin wrote:
It's slightly off-topic from Graham's original proposition in the thread
base-message, which was restricted to multiple-of-two/multiples-of three
type duplets. This part of the thread has strayed beyond extra valid
values for durations, and we've strayed into time-signatures-as-tuplets
territory.
However what you say here is good information and shouldn't get lost.
Maybe you should repost this as a separate [talk] thread, with a more
descriptive title?
I did already post somewhat on this earlier in the GLISS discussions, but more
in regard of the time signatures involved than of note-length indications:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-07/msg00924.html
Anyway, I can certainly write all this up in a more formal way. In all honesty
I'm not overly bothered if note-lengths like 6, 10, 12, 20, ... get permitted in
Lilypond, but if it's introduced for some tuplet cases, it might as well go all
the way.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
