> [...] I still don't want to make the interpretation of identifiers
> depend on case other than, of course, that you need to stick with
> the exact spelling of an identifier once you picked its name.
Besides limiting the namespace of user variables, what are your
arguments against such a change? For me, the simplicity of being able
to always use `.' to mark the hierarchy instead of using a combination
of `<space>' and `.' definitely outweighs the namespace limitation.
> Werner picked up on something I mentioned as a dissatisfactory
> workaround idea, so there is little surprise that I am not in favor.
> I found a quite more satisfactory solution [...]
It seems that I'm missing something. Let's assume that your footnote
syntax change is applied. How do you then solve the case
\tweak Accidental.color #red cis
vs.
\override Voice.Accidental color #red
?
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
