On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:28 PM, <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > On 2012/10/15 06:30:12, janek wrote: >> Could you write explicitely both here and in the commit message that >> "as of 2.17.5, \override is a pop+push"? >> Had i not participated in previous discussion, i would have no idea >> why some overrides could be pop-first and what that could actually >> mean to the music. > > _All_ \override are "pop-first".
Yes, i understand it (thanks to your explanation!). I meant to describe what i would think if i hadn't participated in the discussion. > This is not the place to document it. > I might try to rephrase this, but something like "as of 2.17.5, > \override is a pop+push" has no place whatsoever in the documentation > string of a function. ok, let's just have a note in the commit message. Following Werner's advice, i drop all my objections to this patch. Let's have it included; we can discuss changes to the stack interface (i.e. whether \override should be just a push) separately in the future. LGTM! thanks for your patience, David! and for your watchfulness, Werner! all the best, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
