Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com> writes: > 2012/10/21 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >> David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: >> >>>> I'll merge stable/2.16 into translation. That should be >>>> unproblematic. >>> >>> The only reaction to that was a mail from Francisco which did not much >>> to address this part of my plan. >>> >>> I did this right now, and afterwards discovered that there is a branch >>> translation-staging. It is obvious that I suffer from a case of having >>> not kept track of how translations are actually organized, so it may be >>> possible that someone would need to hand-advance translation-staging to >>> match translation, assuming that the organization of >>> translation/translation-staging is similar to master/staging with regard >>> to automatic testing. >>> >>> Ugh. Sorry for that. With the apparent lack of >>> replies/comments/interest (possibly due to the translation list just >>> downing any contribution from non-list-members), I felt I needed to move >>> ahead in _some_ manner. >> >> Ok, it would appear that translation had been ahead translation-staging >> already before my merge, so it seems I should take no guesses here and >> just let people who actually know what translation-staging is for deal >> with it. > > I think translation-staging is an just experiment from John which he > did not publicly announce. Or I don't remember it.
In that case, if this experiment is no longer active, can we just remove this branch in order to avoid confusion? John? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
