http://codereview.appspot.com/6845078/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6845078/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1240 Documentation/notation/input.itely:1240: Although notes inside a chord do cause events, time-based footnotes That is confusing: stems and flags are not events. I'd rather write something like: "Exactly which of a chord's multiple note events will be deemed the root cause of a stem or flag is undefined. So for annotating those, time-based footnotes are preferable as well." http://codereview.appspot.com/6845078/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1388 Documentation/notation/input.itely:1388: < \single \footnote #'(-1 . -3) "An A" NoteHead This is unnecessarily contorted: a NoteHead is the (only) directly caused grob from a chord note, so just writing \footnote #'(-1 . -3) "An A" a will work fine. \single is only necessary when you _need_ to specify a particular grobname for a footnote attached to an event because the grob in question is not directly attached to the event as well as the only such grob. http://codereview.appspot.com/6845078/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
