Hans Åberg <hans.aber...@telia.com> writes:
> On 12 Jan 2013, at 12:53, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes:
>>
>>>> I have a hard time considering the output of
>>>
>>>> \version "2.16.0"
>>>>
>>>> \relative c' {
>>>> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 2)
>>>> \times 2/3 { c8 d e f g a g f e d c d }
>>>> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
>>>> \times 2/3 { c4 d e f g a g f e d c d }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> useful:
>>>
>>> I think that looks OK?
>>
>> No. In the first case, the beaming should be 2+2+2 rather than 3+3: the
>> whole point is that there is supposed to be a subdivision into three,
>> and 3+3 defeats that.
>
> Hindemith, "Elementary training", p. 116, gives the rule that triplets
> are tripartite and sextuplet bipartite.
But the tuplet brace extends the tripartition to six notes, yielding
three groups of two, contrary to the beaming.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
