James <pkx1...@gmail.com> writes:

>> On 25 February 2013 12:00, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>     "Phil Holmes" <em...@philholmes.net> writes:
>>     
>>     > I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note -
>>     > the output shows this as 2.17.11 since the windows exe
>>     > contained the wrong version number). Output is at
>>     >
>>     > http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.13/
>>     >
>>     > As might be supposed, most of the differences are connecting
>>     > bar lines.
>>     
>>     
>>     Good grief. Yes. A real pity that our default regtest comparisons
>>     blanked those out.
>>     
>>
>> Well it could always be a case of me missing that assuming I did the
>> check.

Unlikely.  It is pretty likely that I also looked at regtest
differences, and the differences are far from subtle and rare.  So I am
pretty sure that the tests were not given any visual presentation,
instead just being filtered prematurely based on the metrics.

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to