James <pkx1...@gmail.com> writes: >> On 25 February 2013 12:00, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> "Phil Holmes" <em...@philholmes.net> writes: >> >> > I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note - >> > the output shows this as 2.17.11 since the windows exe >> > contained the wrong version number). Output is at >> > >> > http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.13/ >> > >> > As might be supposed, most of the differences are connecting >> > bar lines. >> >> >> Good grief. Yes. A real pity that our default regtest comparisons >> blanked those out. >> >> >> Well it could always be a case of me missing that assuming I did the >> check.
Unlikely. It is pretty likely that I also looked at regtest differences, and the differences are far from subtle and rare. So I am pretty sure that the tests were not given any visual presentation, instead just being filtered prematurely based on the metrics. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel