On 2013/03/07 21:25:04, benko.pal wrote: https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely
File Documentation/notation/ancient.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely#newcode952
Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:952: @c @end example On 2013/03/07 21:16:18, aleksandr.andreev wrote: > On 2013/03/07 19:04:52, benko.pal wrote: > > please make the two examples above and below match > > Sorry, I am confused which examples you are referring to. The above
example is
> commented out. Should we eliminate it completely?
sorry, you are right. I mistook @c for code. please ignore me.
It does not make sense to keep outdated comments around. The purpose of comments is to help people, not to confuse them. If the code might be getting used in future, it should be made to match. If it doesn't, it should get removed. https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
