Thanks for the review!
https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/53001/input/regression/skyline-point-extent.ly File input/regression/skyline-point-extent.ly (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/53001/input/regression/skyline-point-extent.ly#newcode5 input/regression/skyline-point-extent.ly:5: even though the @code{NoteHead} stencils are empty. The @code{Stem_engraver} On 2013/03/08 14:24:11, dak wrote:
This talks about the NoteHead stencil being empty, but the actual code
uses a
point-stencil (which is _not_ empty).
Done. https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/53001/lily/separation-item.cc File lily/separation-item.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/53001/lily/separation-item.cc#newcode148 lily/separation-item.cc:148: Interval extra_width = robust_scm2interval (elts[i]->get_property ("extra-spacing-width"), On 2013/03/08 14:24:11, dak wrote:
This is not related to this patch, but isn't it complete nonsense to
use an
Interval here rather than a Drul_array or other form of offset pair?
The LEFT and RIGHT values don't form an interval as far as I can see.
you're right https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/53001/lily/skyline.cc File lily/skyline.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/53001/lily/skyline.cc#newcode649 lily/skyline.cc:649: return ret; On 2013/03/08 14:24:11, dak wrote:
Why not just return *this; here? The function does not return a reference, so a copy is
constructed
anyway. There is no point in doing yet another copy, is there?
Done. https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/53001/scm/output-lib.scm File scm/output-lib.scm (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/53001/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode472 scm/output-lib.scm:472: 10000000)) On 2013/03/08 14:24:11, dak wrote:
Don't we have some constants for the full range START and END values?
I don't think we have one for integers. I made one in lily-library.scm https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/53001/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode478 scm/output-lib.scm:478: (define-public pure-from-neighbor-interface::unobtrusive-height On 2013/03/08 14:24:11, dak wrote:
"unobtrusive" is a bit obscure: I suspected the only-a-bit-empty
interval at
first. "height-if-pure" would be quite more descriptive.
Done. https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel