2013/4/25 <d...@gnu.org>: > To give this some perspective: the starting point for this issue, an > issue about which at least Janek feels strongly enough to repeatedly > raise a stink because somebody (TM) should be doing something (TM) > about it,
It was not my intention to demand that somebody is must do something. If it looked like this, i apologize. I hadn't known that the issue would be so complicated to fix. Anyway, i appreciate your efforts a lot, David. As i see it, we cannot get anything better than a compromise for 2.18. From what i see, the compromise that David suggests seems to be a reasonable one, even if the code is - in a way - unreliable. Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
