Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes:

>> The temporary staff is more natural, but sometimes we need to use a
>> continuous staff with \startStaff \stopStaff in order to convince
>> LilyPond that it goes on the same line
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1449
>
> But #1449 is a bug IMHO...

Sure.  It has been closed as a duplicate of #127 which is still open.

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to