On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:58 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> immanuel litzroth <ilitzr...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:20 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > >> They are also humongous, which means a quite larger amount of work > >> for GUB. > >> > > What do you mean with humongous? Boost is large because it has a lot > > of stuff. > > What's your point? "has a lot of stuff" is not independently useful. > Well, I don't know GUB so I have idea as to the work involved or whether it would even make sense. I do know that writing stuff that boost has on offer is a very bad idea. I also have some experience with c++11 and that has been really good. That's all folks. i
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
