Phil Holmes-2 wrote >> Phil Holmes wrote >>> What's the cautionary on the 3rd beat of the second bar doing there? > >> after reading all this I feel the current behavior is correct > > > It also disappears if you get rid of the ties in the previous bar, left > hand. If it's not there without the tie, surely it shouldn't be there > with > the tie?
ok, I read the rules and descriptions again and - still being confused by scrolling up and down between the different styles - I tend to confirm your opinion (for the styles being discussed here): accidentals are valid for a whole measure and should not be repeated (also not as a cautionary accidental) so this qualifies as bug!? Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Strange-cautionary-tp148054p148113.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel