On 2013/07/23 20:16:24, dak wrote:
On 2013/07/23 20:05:40, david.nalesnik wrote: > > I hesitate to do something like the following! > > #(add-grob-definition > 'SchemeTextSpanner > (list > (cons > 'bound-details > (list [...]
No, that's nonsensical. Instead, complete-grob-entry (or whatever it
was
called)
"completize" -- which sounds like a made-up word to me -- perhaps "complete" is ambiguous: a verb or an adjective?
needs to be changed in order to work non-destructively. It does not make sense to do this separately from the original code.
I'm just not overly enthused of having to do this kind of stuff myself
right now
as I am working on other, hard stuff. So I'm throwing out the
information in
the hope that it becomes somebody else's problem™.
Ah, OK! This will give me (or whoever) something to think about. Thanks, David https://codereview.appspot.com/11614044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
