Colin Campbell <c...@shaw.ca> writes: > On 13-08-11 01:18 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> Colin Campbell <c...@shaw.ca> writes: >> >>> On 13-08-11 10:21 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin Campbell" <c...@shaw.ca> >>>> To: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> >>>> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 5:06 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Windows tutorial >>>>> Is it the non-optimised builds which fail? For a data point, I >>>>> renamed my ~/lilypond-git then used lily-git.tcl to recreate it, >>>>> after which I went through the rest of the build as normal. All I >>>>> saw were the usual warnings about typing and some circular >>>>> references, but both the binary build and make doc completed >>>>> normally, producing a binary which reports as version 2.17.24 and >>>>> corresponding documentation. >>>> In saying "it would require the ability to make doc" I was referring >>>> to the fact that, for quite a few contributors, it just takes too >>>> long. I can fiddle a make doc by editing orchestra.ly, completing >>>> the make and then undoing the edit. >>>> >>>> My system is Ubuntu 10.04 with 64 bit, but I don't know what makes >>>> my build fail and others not. >>> So, we have two systems performing repeatably: your Ubuntu 10.04 >>> 64-bit and my Linux Mint 15 64-bit Ubuntu derivative. Perhaps there is >>> some way of narrowing the (probably many) differences between our >>> systems? >> While they are performing repeatably: can I just get a data point on >> current master? I committed another change. Granted, it's not really >> likely to make a difference when unoptimized builds fail as well, but it >> still would be nice to hear back. >> > > Just got back to my machine after a successful clean build of binary > and doc (into a new /lilypond-git from lily-git.tcl), again with only > the usual warnings on the console. The lily-git console reported the > current head at d8f308 Avoid Scheme-computed skylines.
Oh, "again with only the usual warnings"? I thought that "repeatably" was supposed to mean repeatably crashing. Any news from those who had reliable crashes to show? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
