----- Original Message ----- From: <tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com>
To: <philehol...@googlemail.com>; <em...@philholmes.net>
Cc: <re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>; <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: Adds bar line section to LM (Issue 3408) (issue 12724043)


On 2013/08/12 13:48:32, email_philholmes.net wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com>
To: <mailto:philehol...@googlemail.com>
Cc: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>;
<mailto:re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: Adds bar line section to LM (Issue 3408) (issue 12724043)


> Non-standard headings; otherwise LGTM.
>
>
>

https://codereview.appspot.com/12724043/diff/1/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely
> File Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely (right):
>
>

https://codereview.appspot.com/12724043/diff/1/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely#newcode67
> Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely:67: @subheading Bar
lines
> @unnumberedsubsubsec
> plus @node and menu
> See
>

http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contributor/sectioning-commands
>
>

https://codereview.appspot.com/12724043/diff/1/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely#newcode80
> Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely:80: @subheading Bar
checks
> ditto
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/12724043/

More than happy to make this change, but there's lots and lots of
subheading
headings in that file - should they all be taken out?

--
Phil Holmes


Well, it's quite a bit of work as they'll need menus and nodes
adding.  Each subsubsec will be rather small, but I think it is
well worth doing as these subsubsecs can then be referenced
individually and they'll appear as headings in the ToC.  They
can also be given a more direct reference from the indexes.

https://codereview.appspot.com/12724043/



OK - I suggest I don't change my patch as you've suggested, because the way I did it was to copy the original, and so it currently follows the style for that section. I'll raised an issue to change all instances of @subheading to @unnumberedsubsubsec in the LM and do that once this patch is pushed. That sound OK?

--
Phil Holmes

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to