On 2013/08/30 07:41:49, mike7 wrote:
I'd still argue that (2) is the best way to go as it is a
one-stop-shopping way
to clear all these bugs (and perhaps more) as they arise.
Since we are currently in the process of recovering from the last one-stop-shopping way to clear bugs galore which is where all those regressions are actually from, I suggest that we refrain from embracing your somewhat optimistic estimates until after wrapping up a stable release. And frankly, I completely fail to see how this advertisement as a magic bullet for all the regressions is even remotely rooted in fact. The regressions will not in any way be automagically addressed by such sweeping changes. The changes will offer different ways to address them and you like those better. But that's not the same as actually getting them addressed. https://codereview.appspot.com/9295044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
