"Keith OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net> writes: > On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:14:24 -0700, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote: > >> From: "Keith OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net> >>> Is it possible to minimize an example, so we see if the old behavior >>> is something we want? (as opposed to something that did what you >>> wanted but for mysterious reasons.) >> >> I can provide a non-minimised example (Mikado song number 5). > > If you post the source or maybe link to it in a comment on > http://codereview.appspot.com/13768045 > then I'll try to figure out what made the difference, next time I am on Linux.
<URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3281> also looks iffy, but according to comment #2, it's been around for a long time. It's just another indication that our page breaking code is far from being bug-free. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
