Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:

> 2013/9/30 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>:
>> David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> Not necessary, that's quite sufficient.  I should be able to reproduce
>>> this, I guess.  I have no problems _without_ a separate build
>>> directory.  Now trying with one.
>>
>> Yes, it bombs.  So we managed to distribute a setup that will refrain
>> from building ly-grammar.txt in a separate build directory.
>>
>> Rerunning make will regenerate parser.cc and parser.hh and then
>> recompile from there (first time around) (Huh?).
>>
>> But the grammar file will remain missing.  Deleting
>> ../Documentation/out/ly-grammar.txt will not help, so while my including
>> it in the distribution did nothing for a build with a separate build
>> directory, it also does not seem to be what is causing the problem.
>>
>> Can we bisect this somehow, assuming that 2.17.26 worked?
>
> If I find a 2.17.26-tarball I could test with it this evening (off for work 
> now)
> Compiling 2.17.25 from tarball definitly worked.

I'll see whether I can reproduce this without rolling tarballs, in which
case it should be possible to bisect.

-- 
David Kastrup

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to