Hi,
an afterthought.
On 2013/10/06 01:15:12, david.nalesnik wrote:
The examples below represent my efforts to test the effects of
multiple
applications of \offset. You can see that some accumulation is
possible.
[...]
%%%%
\relative c' {
%% TESTS FOR ACCUMULATION %%
% default
<c e g b>1\arpeggio
\override Arpeggio.positions = #'(-3.5 . 0.5)
<c e g b>1\arpeggio
% values created by override are offset
\offset #'positions #'(-2 . 2) Arpeggio
<c e g b>1\arpeggio
I'm not sure if i haven't missed something, but to your realize that in
this case the offset isn't applied on top of the override (as the
comment suggests), but replaces it? This is self-evident in the example
below:
\relative c' {
% default
<c e g b>1\arpeggio
\override Arpeggio.positions = #'(-5 . 5)
<c e g b>1\arpeggio
\offset #'positions #'(-1 . 2) Arpeggio
<c e g b>1\arpeggio
}
with current master (a82d8622e6b1be36169de7d2fe1f9aa88618933b,
containing offset patch) the last arpeggio is shorter than the second,
while it should be longer in both directions.
best,
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/8647044/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
