On 2013/11/12 10:23:56, dak wrote:
a) we don't commit ourselves either way: it is undefined what a pure
duration
after an intervening chord will do.
b) just single pitches, no chords: that's what this patch proposes.
c) also chords: this patch needs more work, supporting code must be
written,
Pitch_squash_engraver has to be changed etc etc.
The problem is that with both options b) and c), we'll soonish have
music
depending on this behavior.
I'm leaning towards a): tell people not to rely on particular behavior
after a
chord for now.
how does a) differ from b) patch-wise? https://codereview.appspot.com/22120043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
