On 11/27/13 8:32 AM, "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote:

>
>For me this sounds good.
>Requiring to write \include "original-breaks.ly" is significantly better
>than requiring to define the commands.
>But it would still need a separate switch, presumably through the
>command line.

This is true, but it would be possible to put the appropriate command line
switch in Frescobaldi and to access it by means of a check box, right?

Carl


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to