On 11/27/13 8:32 AM, "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote:
> >For me this sounds good. >Requiring to write \include "original-breaks.ly" is significantly better >than requiring to define the commands. >But it would still need a separate switch, presumably through the >command line. This is true, but it would be possible to put the appropriate command line switch in Frescobaldi and to access it by means of a check box, right? Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel