Mike Solomon <m...@mikesolomon.org> writes: > Hey all, > > As 2.18 draws near, I’d like to work with everyone to establish a > system of branching for LilyPond development. After several rounds of > discussing things with David K, this emerged as the best way to avoid > arguments about integrating work into the development branch that have > led several contributors, including myself, to significantly reduce > time on the project. [1]
It will take me considerable time to address this more thoroughly, but in the mean time I want to have on record that what Mike writes here under "this emerged as the best way" _not_ in _any_ way summarizing our discussion. Instead it is his _personal_ idea how to address topics we covered. Writing something like "this emerged as the best way" when we did not even talk about it wrongly insinuates that it presents a common understanding of how to address problems covered in the discussion. Feel free to quote passages or complete mails from me in the course of that discussion: there is nothing in there that I would not have equally said in public. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel