On 2013/12/15 20:00:24, Carl P. wrote:
I don't know that this is the route to go. If our goal is to get people using LP, I don't think that what we need is a function that hides basic structures from the users, where if they want to go beyond this, they have to move from two include commands to a whole new structure. I think what we need is a stripped-down choral/SATB layout that uses minimal overrides and extra code so that new users can copy-and-paste and start experimenting with.
I believe the rest of the templates in the Appendix to the LM have been in the form you suggest for at least 6 years. They will remain there for those users who want to learn. But many users don't want to learn; they just want an easy way of producing simple music with as little effort as possible. Why not give it to them as an alternative? Trevor https://codereview.appspot.com/41990043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
