On 2014/05/30 21:16:19, Mark Polesky wrote:
On 2014/05/30 10:45:36, dak wrote: >> ; (ly-type? vector) => #t > > That's rubbish. None of the given types in ly-type? should trigger
for a
> vector. And indeed it would appear that the definition of
ly:music-list? is
> broken and returns #t for anything that is not a list.
Your new commit still leaves this situation: (ly:music-list? '()) => #t
Is that intended?
Most definitely. Since when is an empty list not a list? https://codereview.appspot.com/95710044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
