On Feb 9, 2014, at 21:19 , Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> wrote: > Here is a work-around for > https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3834 which I suppose > suggests both a resolution and a reason not to make a distinction between > Accidental and AccidentalCautionary in the first place. (I understand there > are probably good reasons to make a distinction or it wouldn’t be that way.)
Is it rude to ask if someone is willing to fix this in the near future? There’s already a work-around described in the ticket; it just needs to be put into Lilypond proper. (Well, a regression test would be nice too.) Thanks, — Dan _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
