"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> > To: "Phil Holmes" <em...@philholmes.net> > Cc: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>; <re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>; > <philehol...@googlemail.com>; <tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:56 PM > Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue > 108270043byphilehol...@googlemail.com) > > > "Phil Holmes" <em...@philholmes.net> writes: > >> > Let's see if anyone else has an opinion. > >> About what? > > About whether it's
What is "it"? > sufficiently a problem to prevent any further updates to the ancient > music documentation, which is what it's doing. What is "it" here? > Please stop further debate, let others comment. On what? > If no-one does, then no-one else shares your concern. I would have written "or yours", but since you do not even bother giving a reason why instrument names should be aligned differently in the presence of incipits, it is not even clear what your concern is. Maybe it's "reviews are a hassle". I can agree with that. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
