Welcome back Valentine! P.S. don't forget to update the google tracker (if not using git-cl) - Patch-New means the patch gets automatic testing.
https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/diff/1/Documentation/changes.tely File Documentation/changes.tely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/diff/1/Documentation/changes.tely#newcode65 Documentation/changes.tely:65: (e.g. for unfretted string instruments). 'String numbers can now be printed using Roman numerals.' Could we get a small @lilypond example here? https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode127 Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely:127: than above. This has some awkward syntax. I suggest: The default number style, as is customary with unfretted strings, can be printed in Roman numerals and can also be placed below the staff rather than above. https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/unfretted-strings.itely File Documentation/notation/unfretted-strings.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/unfretted-strings.itely#newcode118 Documentation/notation/unfretted-strings.itely:118: This could be reduced slightly (and possibly spilt into two paras): 'Roman rather than the default circled Arabic numerals can be added as strings numbers. See @ref{String number indications}. Alternatively, open strings can be indicated by using markup commands with articulation scripts.' https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel