On Oct 26, 2014, at 17:19 , Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> wrote:
>
> I haven’t implemented the double-C cases yet.
This is what I think would be best:
* leave the default style alone
* add to the C style: 4/2 -> CC, 2/1 -> cut-CC
This would end the equivalence of default and C styles. Does that seem like a
bad idea to any seasoned Lilypond developers? I would prefer to hear it now
than to implement it first and hear about it in code review.
My reasoning is that the CC and cut-CC time signatures seem too obscure to be
enabled by default, but too closely related to the C and cut-C time signatures
to deserve a separate style. The new time signatures would make sense within
this matrix:
numbered single-digit
C single-C
Thanks,
—
Dan
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
